Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Vintage Sewing Machines from The Outer Banks

Well this is my blog and I guess I am allowed to go off topic once in a while, so I'll start with a vacation photo.  This is a gorgeous beach near Nag's Head on the Outer Banks of North Carolina.   Having grown up in Coastal Georgia - and still living within a four hour drive of Savannah - it never occurred to me to drive 600 miles to the the Outer Banks.  But WOW, this was worth 10 hours in the car.  

Being the total nerd that I am, I had to visit every museum and historical site I could find which included Kitty Hawk, where the Wright Bros launched aviation history, and the some of the lighthouses along the coast.   Yes, you have to see the Lighthouse at Cape Hatteras before I show you the sewing machines!  ;)
Tallest Lighthouse in North America - about 200 ft.  No, I did not climb to the top! (but my DH did)

I wasn't looking for vintage sewing machines on this trip, but surprisingly, I came across a couple of them in the museums I visited so of course I took photos (yes, photos were allowed).  This Singer was in the Graveyard of the Atlantic Museum at Cape Hatteras in an exhibit showing "Life on the Outer Banks at the Turn of the Century".   A run of the mill machine, but interesting to see it in a museum. (Sorry for the poor quality photos.)

Then at Kitty Hawk, I saw this one which was an example of the one Wilbur Wright used to sew the fabric for his wings.

And also this one, which was the actual one he used.  

Although these aren't Singers, they are similar antique treadles.  How amazing to imagine Wilbur Wright sewing up the wings of his plane on this machine, right?  

I visited umpteen antique stores on this trip, too, and saw the usual old treadle machines galore.  Only one, however, was photo worthy  - and again, its not the best photo.  But it is a beautiful machine, the decals are almost blindingly bright.  I can't help but wonder.... is this a repo?  (Anybody?)

So now I'm home from vacation and have lots to catch up on, including some sewing (bridesmaid dress alterations for a family member's wedding and Halloween costume for granddaughter).  So busy, I go, still dreaming of the beach...

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Is Fifty Fabulous? Well maybe if you are a sewing machine!

Okay, so I had "that" birthday this week.   Fifty years old sounds charmingly vintage when applied to fashions.  It sounds distinguished when applied to men.  But applied to women it just sounds old. :(   Here are probably the only pictures of me you will ever see on this blog because I hate taking photos.  To be fair, the photo on the left was taken a year ago so let's just call it what "almost 50" looks like.   (And yes, that is the Manhattan skyline behind me.)   In comparison, here is a picture of me at 20.  (And yes, that is a rocking horse behind me, I was already the mother of two children.)  At 20 I thought I'd look like that forever...didn't we all?

Now here is a Fifty year old who hasn't changed a bit in half a century
Yes, Bud and I are the same age.   I had to look this word up, but we are Quinquagenarians which is quite a mouthful.   So who has held up better?  No contest, it is this Singer 503 sewing machine.  It still looks as great (if a bit dated) and works as perfectly as the day it was born.  I can't say the same for me either way.  

Besides me and Bud, there are lots of celebs born in 1962, which includes nearly the entire cast of St. Elmo's Fire and a couple of Desperate Housewives  ;)

I am in good company with all these celebs who also turn the big 5-0 this year:

Demi Moore
Jim Carrey
Jon Bon Jovi
Matthew Broderick
Marcia Cross
Emilio Estevez
Ally Sheedy
Tom Cruise
Steve Carrell
Joan Cusak
Nia Vardalos
Kelly Preston (and she just had a baby a couple of years ago...I guess she has some parts that are still working!)
Laura San Giacamo
Daphne Zuniga
Jodie Foster
Andrew McCarthy
Felicity Huffman
Ralph Fiennes

Another big birthday, which happens next month, is my Grandma who will be 100 years old on Halloween. Just to think that she was born the year the Titanic sank and has lived TWO of my lifetimes.  I guess that makes me feel comparatively "young".  


Friday, September 7, 2012

Singer Curvy vs Singer 15-91....Side by Side

Kind of quick post today, sparked off by one of those ubiquitous discussions on PR about Mechanical Vintage vs Computerized Modern sewing machines.  I'll save most of my thoughts on that for another time, but here is one of the main things I wonder about (having never actually sewn on a machine like the Singer Curvy that is pictured here.)   

I want to know how the heck you can see what you're doing on that big hunka plastic machine?  Looking at these side by side, you can see that the housing around the needle bar on the plastic machine is massive and the harp space is quite small compared to the 15-91 pictured below.

With the old machine, you can clearly see what you're doing and you have plenty of room to maneuver your fabric while sewing.   With the new machine it seems the view would be obstructed with that huge blob of plastic hovering over your work and the harp space would be very crowded.   And if that plastic machine isn't installed in a table, won't it jump all over the place when you're trying to sew something large or heavy?

Just wondering, and I'd be curious to hear from folks who have used machines like both of these.   Is it harder to see what you're doing and maneuver your work on one of these blobs of a modern sewing machine vs a sleek, streamlined vintage?

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

A VERRRYYY Old Sewing Machine Manual!

I am not sure what year this is from, but I'm thinking late 19th Century.  These are the tattered remains, but it is interesting especially to see the pictures of the attachments and how they are used.                                                              

Sunday, September 2, 2012

A Little Bit of History - Q&A With a Vintage Singer Expert

Today is a Q&A with a gal who is quite the expert on vintage and antique sewing machines, especially Singers.  Jennifer Hill is a Canadian quilter who primarily uses treadle machines.  She is a member on Pattern Review where she frequently shares her knowledge of the history and mechanics of the sewing machine.  She has agreed to answer a few questions for me here and share pictures of some of the fabulous machines in her collection. 

MKB:   Please tell us a little bit about how you became interested in vintage/antique sewing machines, especially Singers.

JH:  My first vintage machine was a Singer 115 treadle, purchased in 1996.  I had always wanted a treadle as I had heard that the mechanism was very efficient energy transfer technology.  It only took me a few hours of treadle sewing to hook me. 
Singer 115 treadle
I have since acquired many old machines of various makes, but I like Singers because, 1) they are so plentiful.  Singer was the market leader in sewing machine manufacture for many years.  I once heard that they made more machines than all the other makers combined.  I'm not sure if that is true but they certainly made a huge variety of models, filling every market niche,  and 2) they are very easy to self-service because so many parts are readily available.  For example, Singer devised a common low shank foot attachment system late in the 19th century which they used on many of their subsequent models so that feet/attachments could be interchangeable.  This system ultimately became an industry standard, so that many compatible modern generic feet/attachments are now available, for functions that were unimaginable back when these machines were new.  (Examples:  zipper feet, walking feet, darning feet, etc.)

MKB:  What kind of sewing do you primarily do?

JH:  I guess I'm primarily a quilter and have been for 30-40 years.  But I also do a fair bit of garment sewing, plus alterations, if they are interesting enough.  I've done home dec as well, but I keep coming back to quilting which I find to be continually challenging and creative.

MKB:  Tell us a little bit about treadle and hand crank sewing for those of us who have never tried it.  Do you prefer it, and why?

JH:  I'm totally hooked on treadle sewing machines.  As mentioned above, I have found these mechanisms to be extremely efficient and responsive, such that I use them for the bulk of my sewing.  Oh yes, did I mention that they are generally CHEAP????  I simply cannot imagine paying the prices of modern high end sewing machines when vintage/antique ones work so well and are so cheap.  I often like to say of my treadles, "What other $20 machines are you likely to find with an auto needle up/down?"  As for handcranks, I don't find them quite so comfortable to use, unless one needs low speed control.  Mind you, I sometimes like to imagine seamstresses of 120 years ago, and how sewing machines, even crankers, were sooooo much faster than the alternative - hand sewing.  The oldest ones in my collection also have some very interesting, obsolete mechanisms and I enjoy tracking the evolution of their engineering.

MKB:  What are the oldest and newest Singer that you have?

JH:  My oldest Singer is my Model 12 (New Family), built in 1888.  This is usually considered to be the model that launched Singer's pre-eminence in the industry.  It was in production (with various "improvements") from 1863 to 1902, and was the first mass marketed home use sewing machine.
Singer New Family, Model 12
My most recent Singer is my 20U "Artisan" zig-zag industrial (circa 1980's)
Singer 20U

MKB:  In your opinion, which model of Singer is their finest and why?

JH:  Whenever someone asks me about the "best" or "finest", I have to ask, "best for what?"  Generally, all the singers from the pre-plastic gear era where of uniform high quality, although in the years post WWII, European makers like Elna, Husqvarna and Bernina offered features that Singer wouldn't for many years to come.  For example, the Elna Supermatic used cams to produce reverse motion stitches (where the cam controlled the fwd/bkwd motion of the feed dogs as well as the needle swing) in the 1950's while Singers couldn't do this until the 1970's Golden Touch-N-Sews.  But speaking from personal experience, who needs such stitches anyways??? Singers were even late to the zz functionality for home machines because as market leaders they were not prepared to respond to consumer demand, rather they expected to dictate to their markets.  

Anyway, I personally like the straight stitch models.  The 201 (1934-1957) has often been considered the "best" of it's era, as it's horizontal rotary hook is so fast, smooth and silent.  It is excellent for most household/dressmaker uses.  But this hook configuration isn't ideal for using heavy thread, free motion work or sewing heavy fabrics.  Vertical oscillating hooks (Class 15's) are more forgiving under such conditions and are fine all-around performers, even if they are a bit noisier and have slower max speeds.  These full-sized models are fine for at home sewing, but even in "portable" cases are awkward (HEAVY) to transport.  Lightweight portables (I call them "one handers") like the 221/222 Featherweights or the full-sized AL 301s are better choices if one will be traveling.  However these machines, unless contained in tables or cabinets, are light enough to be easily displaced when sewing bulky items such as overcoats or large quilts.
Singer AL 301
Unlike modern machines, even Singer's bottom end machines were always fine performers.  Vibrating shuttle (long bobbin) models were in production from the 1880's until the 1950's because there were reliable and cheap - if noisy.  These were very popular as treadles and hand cranks, and later by electric motors.  However, operating one of these with a motor defines the "vibrating" in vibrating shuttle - they tend to walk across the table at higher speeds.
Singer 27 treadle with vibrating shuttle
If one cannot have one of every model, one must carefully analyze one's sewing needs to choose the most appropriate or "finest" models for one's needs.  But there is nothing wrong with having one of each model!

MKB:   Of all the Singer models, it seems that the Class 15 is the most enduring prototype.  Can you walk us through the evolution of the various 15 models in the past 100 years and tell us a little bit about the "15 Clones"?

JH:  Class 15's go back much further than 100 years.  Singer introduced it's first round bobbin, vertical oscillating hook model, the Improved Family, in 1875, and variants were in production until the 1960's.  The primary changes over the years involved improvements to the bobbin/hook systems, stitch length selection (including reverse), internal gear drive motors vs belt drive external motors, and updated body styles.  However, older featured models often remained in concurrent production with more modern ones, as production was tailored to various geographic and socio-economic markets.
Singer 15-96 hand crank machine
The term "15 Clones" usually  refers to machines of similar mechanisms, made by other manufacturers, especially Asians ones, Post WWII.  After the defeat of Japan in 1946, the occupying power realized that a successful transition from military to civilian society required an expanding manufacturing economy.  To assist in this effort, the engineering plans for Singer's Class 15 machines were GIVEN to the Japanese industry.  (It is not clear what Singer thought of this arrangement, since they had suffered greatly from a corporate standpoint during the War.   Factories in Allied countries had been requisitioned for production of wartime necessities, and those in the Eastern Bloc were nationalized without compensation.  Also, their very competent and visionary president, Sir Douglas Alexander, died suddenly in 1949 leaving a leadership vacuum at the top.)  
Class 15 "Clone"machine - quite a beauty.  (From Craigslist)

As the 15 was an old design by this time, it is unlikely any components were covered by existing patents, even if Singer had wished to contest the action.  Many Japanese manufacturers produced versions, which were almost all identical and destined for export to North America and Europe, at prices that severely undercut those of established makers in the target markets.  These units seldom had any maker's marks on them to identify them as Japanese as imports from that country were considered in those days to be inferior to Western goods.  Instead they were usually decalled - or badged - with Western sounding names at the request of the various distributors or retailers who imported them.  Despite their original imagine, they have mostly proved to be of high quality and kick started the Japanese and Asian sewing machine industry, which has now pretty much obliterated that industry in the West.
Another 15 Clone - they often came in bright colors, but otherwise duplicated the familiar Singer 15
(From Craigslist)

MKB:  What is your "dream Singer", the one you still hope to add to your collection?

JH:  This one is easy and has been on my wish list for years - a Singer 72W industrial hemstitcher machine.  Of course in an industrial treadle base!  I'm not sure what I really need a hemstitcher for, but this one looks complicated enough to provide many hours of entertaining puzzle value. 
Singer 72W Hemstitcher

THANK YOU, Jennifer for all the great information!  If anyone has any questions, I can pass them on the Jennifer so she can give us the answers.  Or you can find her on Pattern Review (username: Jennifer Hill) to read lots more information that she shares on the message boards there.

UPDATE:  September 29, 2013.  Sadly, I have just heard that Jennifer Hill passed away this week.  Although I never met her in person, like many members of Pattern Review I always enjoyed her contributions to the forum.  She seemed to know everything there is to know about antique and vintage sewing machines!  I considered it a privilege that she gave me all the information for this blog post and I enjoyed corresponding with her about it.  We have lost a font of knowledge in the PR community which I know pales in comparison with the loss to her family.